Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Nothing can be more heinous than a crime committed on the person of a child by her father, the one who is duty-bound to provide her unflinching protection from all harm.”

Continue reading
146 of TULRCA incompatible with Art
Case BriefsForeign Courts

The Court held that S. 146 of TULRCA is incompatible with ECHR Convention insofar as it fails to provide any protection against penalties, intended to deter trade union members from taking part in lawful strike action organised by their trade unions.

Continue reading
jurisdiction to deal with UAPA
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The State Government has been given exclusive power delegated by virtue of Section 22(1) of the NIA Act to constitute one or more Special Courts for trial of offences under any or all the enactments specified in the Schedule to the NIA Act

Continue reading
Gauhati High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

For dealing with pollution of Bharalu River, three Sewage Treatment Plants are proposed to be constructed at different locations and Phases-I and II of the project are scheduled to be completed in the year 2030.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Making derogatory complaints against spouse demonstrate lack of mutual respect and goodwill, which is crucial for a healthy marriage and merely by stating that such complaints are made after parties had separated, in no manner absolves a spouse from the guilt of committing cruelty on the receiving end.

Continue reading
statement before NDPS official inadmissible
Case BriefsSupreme Court

In Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) 16 SCC 31, it was held that officers authorised under Section 53 of the NDPS Act were ‘police officers’ and the statements made to them under Section 67 were inadmissible in evidence.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Even assuming the recorded consumption to be lesser than the average computed consumption of electricity, it can at best raise a doubt against the respondent; it cannot act as a proof beyond reasonable doubt to hold that the respondent has dishonestly tampered with the meter.”

Continue reading
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Section 269-SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has a specific bar on receiving a sum more than 20,000/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

By virtue of the two impugned actions/orders, today the respondents are trying to wrongly give retrospective seniority to the other similarly situated personnel like the petitioners herein by putting them ahead of such petitioners in the already existing seniority list as on date, which, as per the settled position of law, is not permissible.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court found no substantial evidence to exercise discretion in favor of Ramesh Sippy’s inheritance claim.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A petition was filed challenging the circular dated 12-03-2024, issued by Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying prohibiting import, breeding and selling of twenty-four dog breeds.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The allegation with respect to applicants teasing the deceased in regard to the failure of his romantic relationship with applicant does not appear to be instigation which would amount to abetment of suicide in terms of Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Imposition of costs in cases of frivolous litigation is essential to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and fairness of the judicial system. By deterring abuse of the legal process, promoting judicial efficiency, and upholding the principles of fairness and justice, cost imposition serves to safeguard the rights of individuals, protect the integrity of the legal system, and bolster public confidence in the administration of justice.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Act grants 10 percent reservation to the Maratha community under the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) category. A report of MSBCC cited ‘exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations’ for surpassing the total reservation limit of 50 percent.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

To avail the benefit of insurance policy of Rs.1,50,00,000/-, an innocent person was killed to portray that the accused had met with an accident and in the said accident, the car in which the accused was travelling caught fire and got burnt.

Continue reading
AICTE approval case
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court said that AICTE itself never claimed that it was dishonestly induced to grant such approvals and that essential link is altogether missing, whereby any such criminal charge of cheating can be sustained against the accused persons.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“For a special statute, such as the IT Act, to override the general law, such as the IPC, the ingredients of the offence under both laws must be the same. If any ingredient of an offense under the IPC is missing in the act made punishable under the special statute, the IPC will not be excluded, and it can still be resorted to.”

Continue reading
guidelines for trial of deaf and mute persons
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court noted that the guidelines for conducting trial against persons who are deaf and mute, but otherwise of sound mind to commit a heinous offence, were not laid down by the Court.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Democracy is the basic principle in our constitution. Our country is the largest democratic country in the world. The sculptural inscriptions would show that democracy prevailed in our country even during the ancient times.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“When no opportunity is given to deal with an argument which goes to the root of the case based on evidence which go behind the back of the party and results in a denial of justice to the prejudice of the party, the same would amount to violation of principle of natural justice.”

Continue reading