jharkhand high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jharkhand High Court said that one of the issues involved relates to determination of valuation of excisable goods and/or rate of duty of excisable goods, amongst other things, for the purpose of assessment.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A levy of interest on refund must undoubtedly follow where it was found that the amount has been unjustifiably retained or remitted with undue delay and thus, the respondents cannot be permitted to retain moneys which are otherwise not due or are otherwise liable to be returned.”

Landmark Judgments on Banking Laws [2022] Part I
Experts CornerSiddharth R Gupta

by Siddharth R. Gupta†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 30

Invocation of incorrect methodology
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court held that the CBEC circular was not contrary to the intent of the Central Excise Act and Rules. Thus, the show cause notice is not defective and unenforceable. However, the order of the Commissioner regarding the value of the goods sold to the Assessee’s sister concerns is in consonance with the Court’s earlier judgments and CBEC Circular.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Andhra Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Joymalya Bagchi and K. Suresh Reddy, JJ., held that, SVLDRS Discharge certificate cannot be withheld

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Explaining the scheme of provisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944, the 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and AS

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Deciding the question whether interest is payable on the differential excise duty with retrospective effect that become payable on the

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the appeal against the order of the High Court where it refused to issue mandamus to the Central Government