Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Aurangabad bench of Bombay High Court set aside orders refusing Thackeray’s discharge in case of abetment of violence

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It cannot be disputed that the parliamentary elections have been notified and and there cannot be any doubt so far as the urgency of the applicant is concerned and his affiliation with a political party may also not be doubted as he had been a Member of either House for five times.”

Wadhawan Brothers case
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Arpit Goel†

Jurisdiction in Cybercrimes and Civil Disputes
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Nishant Verma†

Non-compliance of Section 173(2) of CrPC
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The form of the police report under Section 173(2) of the CrPC is prescribed by the State Government and each State Government has its own Police Manual to be followed by the police officers while discharging their duty.”

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court answered the question in negative pointing out that Section 125, CrPC envisages that wives, parents and minor children can claim for maintenance.

pre-arrest bail to Amanatullah Khan denied
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Being a public figure in politics, petitioner is first and foremost in the public service and it is natural that he will always have something or other happening in his constituency. It is for the public figure to find time and appear before the investigating agency, when so required as per the law.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is crucial to recognize that delays in the victim’s testimony before the learned trial court, often attributed to the intricate nature of trauma recovery, should not serve as grounds for the accused to seek bail.

Law Enforcement Agencies
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Anuj Berry†, Sourabh Rath††, Megha Janakiraman††† and Aparajito Sen††††

Section 43D (5) of UAPA
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court observed that “mere delay in trial pertaining to grave offences as one involved in the instant case cannot be used as a ground to grant bail.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The objective for ‘further investigation’ is to find the truth and bring evidence on record for ensuring substantial justice. However, this right does not extend to mere ‘reinvestigation’ or ‘fresh investigation’ to be started ab initio.”

DHFL Fraud case
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Supreme Court noted that the right of the investigating officer to pray for further investigation in terms of Section 173 (8) is not taken away only because a chargesheet is filed under Section 173 (2) against the accused.

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court invoked Section 465 of the CrPC, emphasizing that no finding, sentence, or order shall be reversed unless a failure of justice has been proven.

allahabad high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Under Section 311 CrPC, the power lies in the Courts only and under Section 233 CrPC, the right lies with the accused and the court’s interference is limited”

allahabad high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court allowed the husband to avail the appropriate legal remedies, under civil and criminal law

karnataka high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In this case the complainant had challenged the “flea bite sentence” passed by the Trial Court against the accused who had pleaded guilty of causing death of 8 stray puppies.

To Stay or Not to Stay
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ram Kumar†

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“While there can be no dispute on the fact that complainant himself may have been guilty of not having paid the instalments in accordance with the Loan Agreement with the Finance Company, however, the recovery of the vehicle can only be made in accordance with the law.”

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Due to accessibility of sexually explicit material on the internet, porn addiction is becoming a growing concern in teenagers. With the click of a button, they can be exposed to endless pages of adult content”

misbranding
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The punishment under PFA and the penalty under the FSSA cannot be imposed on the violator for the same misbranding because it will amount to double jeopardy, which is prohibited under Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India.”