competitive exam
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed challenging the vires of Rule 14 of Building & Other Construction Workers Welfare

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

    Competition Commission of India: While deciding upon the complaint filed against Google alleging contravention of the provisions of the Competition

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“One of the most important issue that comes out is to what extent should a platform operator, in this case Google, set governance rules purportedly to “protect” its ecosystem and should there be limits to this self-assumed role?”

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

    Competition Commission of India: In a significant development, the Commission while deliberating upon the alleged contravention of Sections 3 and

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) allowed the

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): P.K. Choudhary (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal holding that Cenvat Credit of Service Tax

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

    On 12-8-2022 the Ministry of Law and Justice notified the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 to define Anti-Doping rule violation, athlete

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed involving the question of

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of K.R. Shriram and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ. took cognizance of a petition which was filed

Legislation UpdatesNotifications

On 12-07-2022, the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore and 67.80 lakh on Ola Financial Services

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Division Coram of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical

Legislation UpdatesNotifications

The Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 1.5 crore on Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.(‘Kotak’) for contravening the

SEBI
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Dark Fibre/Leased Line connectivity allowed to certain Stock Brokers, the Adjudicating Officer In the matter relating

Legislation UpdatesRules & Regulations

The Central Government notifies National Financial Reporting Authority Amendment Rules, 2022 to amend the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018. The Amendment

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): While deciding the instant appeal filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC challenging the order passed

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) partly allowed an appeal which raised the question as to

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (ITAT): Addressing the issue, of whether mere rejection of the claim by an Assessing Officer would ipso

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Competition Commission of India (CCI): Noting that in respect of cases concerning cartels that are hidden or secret, there is little or

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court: Md. Nizamuddin, J. decided on a petition which was filed challenging the impugned order of the appellate commissioner confirming