Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Since this a case that brings to the fore a palpable error, the Court, which is otherwise wary of entering an arena reserved for the experts, is constrained to entertain the writ petition and grant the necessary relief.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Purpose of examination is to screen out best candidates available for job and since petitioner obtained more than minimum required marks, he should have been considered for Stage-II under General Category as his rejection is not based on merit but only on account of document verification.”

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: In a case filed by Swapnil Prakash Parab (‘petitioner’) challenging rejection to the representation made before Bhabha

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Anoop Kumar Dhand and Pankaj Bharadwaj, JJ., disposed of the petition and directed the Department

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Gauhati High Court: Manojit Bhuyan J., simplifying the applicability of Rule 3 and Rule 4 of Assam Public Service (Preferential Appointment) Rules,

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ* and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ, while upholding Allahabad High Court’s order

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Ex-BSF Jawan Tej Bahadur’s nominations were rejected by the returning officer for want of a certificate to the effect that he has not been dismissed for corruption or disloyalty to the State.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Patna High Court: The Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Anjana Mishra, J. rejected an appeal filed by a candidate

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a plea against the grant of inadequate time to