Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court strictly noted that such a conduct is unbecoming for a person belonging to legal profession and also reprimanded the Tribunal for withholding the compensation from the petitioner due to a fee dispute between a layer and their client.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that it seems that the petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed the present petition after being a beneficiary of the very same process only because he has been denied extension or reappointment.

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant appeal for restoration assailing the order passed by the Trial Court wherein the

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant petition seeking quashment of complaint against a Senior Advocate, wherein it was alleged that he

Interviews

Interviewed by Ayush Shukla

Interviews

Interviewed by Vranda Agarwal

Interviews

Interviewed by Khushbu Sood

Conference/Seminars/LecturesLaw School News

The Internship & Placement Cell of the University School of Law and Legal Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi is organizing

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court: Expressing that, Power of discretion is to be exercised to mitigate the injustice if any occurred to the litigants,

ArticlesMental Health

by Radhika Bishwajeet Dubey†

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani†, Asif Lampwala††, Kenneth Martin††† and Srishti Ramchandani*
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 13

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“When the undeniable facts, including the traffic blockage due to agitation, are taken into consideration, the State alone remains responsible for not providing smooth passage of traffic.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: While expressing its opinion on the position of an advocate in law, C. Hari Shankar, J., expressed that, There

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where the party, in a subsequent petition seeking same relief, had not disclosed the filing of the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., allowed a petition which dealt with the issue as to whether the third child born

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Gujarat High Court: The Division Bench of Vineet Kothari and B.N. Karia, JJ., took up a petition which dealt with the parties

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Arunadhri Iyer* and Ashwin Mathew**

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Shailendra Shukla, JJ., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Gautam Chowdhary, JJ., has requested the Registrar (Listing) through the Registrar