Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court stated that dominant purpose of the employee should be considered, instead of any additional duties performed.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court’s finding, affirming Hospital as an Industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 validating State Government’s referral authority, and confirming the continuous service of the workman.

Standing Orders CCA Rules
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court clarified that Standing Orders cover wider activities of workmen and were workmen specific, yet, in view of Section 13B of 1946 Act, a specific notification can be made applying CCA Rules 1965 to that specific aspect, but a notification was necessary.

telangana high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The respondents were directed to count the service of the workman from the date of removal till his death with all attendant benefits payable to the petitioner but without back wages.”

allahabad high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court said that it is not possible to hold that temporary employment for every seasonal increase in industrial activities as an unfair labour practice.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. R. Rajappa, 1978 (3) SCR 207 acts as a North star for the courts to reach the conclusion regarding the applicability of the Industrial Dispute Act to an organization by laying down elaborate guidelines with respect to the definition of ‘industry’ under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Dispute Act.

Workman
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court observed that effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings.

Telangana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Telangana High Court: M Laxman, J. allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits and held that

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: K.S. Mudagal, J., allowed the petition and set aside the impugned award awarding compensation as well as the silver

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., while examining a case which was dismissed 30 years ago with regard to a workman’s

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., decided a matter with regard to payment of full

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Siddhartha Verma, J. reiterated the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Lal Mohammad v. Indian Railway Construction

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Navin Sinha and Indu Malhotra* has set aside the impugned judgment of Uttaranchal

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jharkhand High Court: S. N Pathak J., upheld the award applying the principle of equal pay for equal work.  The facts of

Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, CJ and Murdu N.B. Fernando and

Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Full Bench of Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, and

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Patna High Court: Shivaji Pandey, J. allowed the writ application to the extent that the impugned order was remanded back to the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated the writ petition where the petitioner raised questions related to the order of the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Arun Bhansali, J.,  allowed the writ petition filed in regard to payment of minimum wages as

Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Division Bench comprising of Mushir Alam and Munib Akhtar, JJ. while hearing an appeal in relation to